[meta.reflection.array] Use "character type" in Mandates#8063
Merged
Conversation
jwakely
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2025
tkoeppe
added
the
needs rebase
eisenwave
force-pushed
the
mandates-character-type
branch
from
f3872a1 to
16f7107
Compare
eisenwave
removed
the
needs rebase
Member
Author
|
@tkoeppe @jensmaurer can we merge? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following the discussion in #8043 (comment)
We already have the defined term "character type", and I find it silly not to use it but to enumerate all of its members.
Jonathan stated that there should be a cross-reference (I assume to [basic.fundamental]), which is a good idea.