[basic.scope.pdecl], [temp] Replace "expansion statement" with "expansion-statement"#8370
Merged
Conversation
…sion-statement" Fixes NB US 2-404 (C++26 CD).
jensmaurer
approved these changes
Oct 26, 2025
jensmaurer
left a comment
jensmaurer
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Those are all statements about grammar, so referring to the grammarterm expansion-statement is correct.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes NB US 2-404 (C++26 CD).
Also fixes https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/585.
This PR does a little bit more than the NB comment asked for. We have the bad language of
and
The NB comment only relates to the second case, but in general, if we talk about one grammatical thing being inside another, we should consistently use grammar font.