Skip to content

[meta.reflection.substitute] Name correct function in comments #8372

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
jensmaurer merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2025
Merged

[meta.reflection.substitute] Name correct function in comments #8372

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions source/meta.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6067,16 +6067,16 @@
auto fn1();

static_assert(!can_substitute(^^fn1, {^^int})); // OK
constexpr info r1 = substitute(^^fn1, {^^int}); // error: \tcode{fn<int>} contains an undeduced
constexpr info r1 = substitute(^^fn1, {^^int}); // error: \tcode{fn1<int>} contains an undeduced
// placeholder type for its return type

template<class T>
auto fn2() {
static_assert(^^T != ^^int); // static assertion failed during instantiation of \tcode{fn<int>}
static_assert(^^T != ^^int); // static assertion failed during instantiation of \tcode{fn2<int>}
return 0;
}

constexpr bool r2 = can_substitute(^^fn2, {^^int}); // error: instantiation of body of \tcode{fn<int>}
constexpr bool r2 = can_substitute(^^fn2, {^^int}); // error: instantiation of body of \tcode{fn2<int>}
// is needed to deduce return type
\end{codeblock}
\end{example}
Expand Down