Skip to content

[atomics.ref.pointer] Do not refer to T#8413

Merged
tkoeppe merged 1 commit into
cplusplus:mainfrom
dalg24:atomic_ref_pointer
Nov 5, 2025
Merged

[atomics.ref.pointer] Do not refer to T#8413
tkoeppe merged 1 commit into
cplusplus:mainfrom
dalg24:atomic_ref_pointer

Conversation

@dalg24

@dalg24 dalg24 commented Nov 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tkoeppe tkoeppe requested a review from jwakely November 4, 2025 23:42
@tkoeppe

tkoeppe commented Nov 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please update commit messages to contain the standard "Fixes NB ..." phrase (see other commits).

Fixes US 195-313 (C++26 NB).
@dalg24 dalg24 force-pushed the atomic_ref_pointer branch from 937f0f2 to f778739 Compare November 4, 2025 23:46

@jwakely jwakely left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LWG determined this is editorial, because there's no T in scope here and what we care about is being able to do arithmetic on some pointer-type which requires knowing the sizeof the pointee type. The edit matches what LWG asked for.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit a1e1535 into cplusplus:main Nov 5, 2025
2 checks passed
@tkoeppe

tkoeppe commented Nov 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dalg24 Close enough :-)

@dalg24

dalg24 commented Nov 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@dalg24 Close enough :-)

Yeah sorry I noticed I had the wrong message but I had another branch checked out and was planning to fix it again later.

@dalg24 dalg24 deleted the atomic_ref_pointer branch November 5, 2025 00:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants