P1789R3 Library Support for Expansion Statements#8482
Conversation
|
While applying the paper I noticed that we use the section title "Tuple interface" in [complex.tuple] and [array.tuple] instead. Shall we do the same here and rename [intseq.binding] to [intseq.tuple] along with "Tuple interface" as title? |
I'm personally fine with such inconsistency because |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
|
Hmm, there are multiple NB comments for this actually: |
|
Please amend the commit message per https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/wiki/Commit-message-format#nb-comment-resolutions and force-push. Feel free to squash the fix-up commit at that time. (add "Also fixes NB ...") |
Fixes NB IT 002, FR 007-011, CZ 2-143, US 78-144 (C++26 CD). Editorial note: * The declarations of tuple_size and tuple_element are moved to after the "synopsis heading" under which their specializations are declared, similar to how this is presented elsewhere.
7688f89 to
3d71a83
Compare
Fixes #8473
Also fixes cplusplus/papers#535
Also fixes cplusplus/nbballot#584
Also fixes cplusplus/nbballot#721
Also fixes cplusplus/nbballot#722
Also fixes cplusplus/nbballot#723