Skip to content

[expr.add] Simplify phrasing around ptrdiff_t and avoid redundancy#8569

Merged
tkoeppe merged 1 commit into
cplusplus:mainfrom
jensmaurer:c61
Dec 13, 2025
Merged

[expr.add] Simplify phrasing around ptrdiff_t and avoid redundancy#8569
tkoeppe merged 1 commit into
cplusplus:mainfrom
jensmaurer:c61

Conversation

@jensmaurer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes #8564

@eisenwave eisenwave left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure why we're not just adjusting #8565, but this solution seems fine too.

@jensmaurer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Sorry, I overlooked the other pull request before doing mine :-(

@eisenwave eisenwave added the P3-Other Triaged issue not in P1 or P2 label Nov 30, 2025
@tkoeppe
tkoeppe merged commit 1efa5fe into cplusplus:main Dec 13, 2025
2 checks passed
@jensmaurer
jensmaurer deleted the c61 branch December 15, 2025 08:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

P3-Other Triaged issue not in P1 or P2

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[expr.add] Harmonize wording for pointer subtraction/std::ptrdiff_t with [expr.sizeof]

3 participants