Skip to content

[2026-03 LWG Motion 18] P3961R1 Less double indirection in function_ref (RU-220)#8901

Merged
tkoeppe merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
motions-2026-03-lwg-18
Apr 19, 2026
Merged

[2026-03 LWG Motion 18] P3961R1 Less double indirection in function_ref (RU-220)#8901
tkoeppe merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
motions-2026-03-lwg-18

Conversation

@jensmaurer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • Use code, not English, in definition of is-convertible-from-specialization

Fixes #8852

Also fixes cplusplus/papers#2608
Also fixes cplusplus/nbballot#790

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the post-2026-03 milestone Apr 1, 2026
Comment thread source/support.tex Outdated
@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2026-03-lwg-18 branch 2 times, most recently from 69fa73e to 0b72445 Compare April 19, 2026 14:21
Fixes NB RU 220 (C++26 CD).

Editorial note:
* The value of the feature test macro __cpp_lib_function_ref is
  increased to 202604, since it has already been increased by a
  prior motion in this meeting, and implementers expressed interest
  in a separate value.
* Use code, not English, to expresss the conjunction in the
  definition of is-convertible-from-specialization.
@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2026-03-lwg-18 branch from 0b72445 to 62014ef Compare April 19, 2026 14:22
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 42f942c into main Apr 19, 2026
3 of 4 checks passed
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the motions-2026-03-lwg-18 branch June 13, 2026 19:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[2026-03 LWG Motion 18] P3961R1 Less double indirection in function_ref P3961 R1 Less double indirection in function_ref (RU-220)

4 participants