Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] optimize sequence number queries for job events - #146

Open
crabcanon wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-job-events-sequence-5502269953196930861
Open

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] optimize sequence number queries for job events#146
crabcanon wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-job-events-sequence-5502269953196930861

Conversation

@crabcanon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What:
Replaced list_for_job(limit=1000)[-1] which loaded up to 1000 entire JobEvent rows into Python memory with a fast get_max_sequence_no database-side aggregation method using func.coalesce(func.max(...), 0).

🎯 Why:
Fetching list objects to calculate the max sequence causes high database transfer, memory bloat, and slower processing during large event insertions. By performing the maximum calculation natively via SQL, we resolve an effective N+1 style bottleneck.

📊 Impact:
Significantly reduces query serialization/deserialization time and memory footprint during JobControlService sequence calculations, resulting in much faster job event logging capabilities.

🔬 Measurement:
Tested and verified with the integration test suite and code review, passing successfully with no semantic behaviour change.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 5502269953196930861 started by @crabcanon

Replaced memory-heavy query (`list_for_job(limit=1000)[-1]`) with an efficient SQL scalar aggregation query `get_max_sequence_no` for computing the next sequence number in JobControlServices.

Co-authored-by: crabcanon <3458947+crabcanon@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
cortex Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 19, 2026 7:48pm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant