🛡️ Sentinel: [security improvement] Add security headers to API responses - #157
🛡️ Sentinel: [security improvement] Add security headers to API responses#157crabcanon wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…nses Co-authored-by: crabcanon <3458947+crabcanon@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
🚨 Severity: MEDIUM
💡 Vulnerability: Missing security headers on API responses.
🎯 Impact: The API is missing standard defense-in-depth headers, such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which can expose the application to potential MIME-sniffing, clickjacking, and lack of enforced HTTPS for subdomains.
🔧 Fix: Appended
Strict-Transport-Security,X-Frame-Options, andX-Content-Type-Optionsheaders insiderequest_context_middleware.✅ Verification: Ensure tests pass. The end-to-end functionality continues to run perfectly.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 10835625129495743378 started by @crabcanon