Skip to content

examples: keyness-vs-keyness era diamonds + clearer labels - #9

Merged
zolizoli merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
keyness-vs-keyness
Jul 1, 2026
Merged

examples: keyness-vs-keyness era diamonds + clearer labels#9
zolizoli merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
keyness-vs-keyness

Conversation

@zolizoli

@zolizoli zolizoli commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Adds a 'keyness vs keyness across eras' section to the presidential example: each era's distinctive vocabulary (over-represented words by keyness vs the rest of the corpus, via RankedList.from_scores) diamonded against another era's. Two comparisons (1950-1974 vs 2000-2024; 1825-1849 vs 2000-2024) in the gallery + executed notebook + docs. Also fixes the frequency-vs-keyness diamond labels so the axes read 'rank in frequency' / 'rank in keyness', and clarifies the caption. Examples/docs only — no package code change, no release.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

- Add 'keyness vs keyness across eras' to the presidential example: rank each
  era's over-represented words by keyness against the rest of the corpus (a
  shared reference), then diamond two eras' distinctive-vocabulary rankings.
  Adds 1950-1974 vs 2000-2024 and 1825-1849 vs 2000-2024 to the gallery + notebook.
- Fix the frequency-vs-keyness diamond labels ('by frequency' -> 'frequency') so
  the axes read 'rank in frequency' / 'rank in keyness'; clarify the docs caption.

Examples/docs only — no package code change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@zolizoli
zolizoli merged commit fd34edb into main Jul 1, 2026
4 checks passed
@zolizoli
zolizoli deleted the keyness-vs-keyness branch July 1, 2026 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant