Fix sink upgrade - error to warning

[Mohamed-Elfardy]

Allow sink-only config upgrades when sources or metrics storage do not support upgrades.

Unsupported upgrades now emit a warning instead of failing, and the sink schema upgrade proceeds as expected.
The "--version" output was also updated to include the sink schema version.
the error message turned into warning.

Fixes #1114

[0xgouda]

please fix the failing linter test.

[Mohamed-Elfardy]

please fix the failing linter test.

Hi,
No code changes here — this is just an empty commit to re-run CI after the previous workflow failure.

The workflow is waiting for your approval.
Thanks!

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 21474436026

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 25 of 71 (35.21%) changed or added relevant lines in 5 files are covered.
• 5 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.4%) to 74.874%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
internal/cmdopts/errors.go	0	3	0.0%
cmd/pgwatch/main.go	1	13	7.69%
internal/cmdopts/cmdconfig.go	16	47	34.04%

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
internal/cmdopts/cmdconfig.go	5	60.36%

Totals
Change from base Build 21397124131:	-0.4%
Covered Lines:	4020
Relevant Lines:	5369

---

💛 - Coveralls

[pashagolub]

Suggested change

	ConfigSchema = "00824"
	SinkSchema = "01110"
	configSchema = "00824"
	sinkSchema = "01110"

I think lower-cased var names are better to keep the whole style of the definition

[pashagolub]

No, we shouldn't log here. We should return error. But let user ability to remove config option completely and re-run the command.

[pashagolub]

Because here we return error. We must behave the same in all situations.

The problem was not in how we handle, but that it's impossible to run upgrade command without specifying --sources and --metrics flags. This is the main issue! We must allow upgrade specifying only minimal --sink or --metrics options

[Mohamed-Elfardy]

Thanks for the detailed feedback, that makes sense
I understand now that the core issue is not just changing error → warning, but allowing upgrade to run with minimal flags
(only --sink or --metrics) without requiring both --sources and --metrics.

I’ll rework the logic to make the behavior consistent across all cases and update the implementation accordingly.
Please let me know if there’s any preferred approach or specific place you’d like me to focus on first.

[Mohamed-Elfardy]

All checks are passing now.

If there are any remaining adjustments you’d like me to make, please let me know and I’ll address them.

[pashagolub]

overruled by #1175. Thanks for your contribution!