Skip to content

test: add Ubuntu 26.04 to example-basic workflow#1791

Merged
mschile merged 2 commits into
cypress-io:masterfrom
MikeMcC399:add/ubuntu-26.04
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

test: add Ubuntu 26.04 to example-basic workflow#1791
mschile merged 2 commits into
cypress-io:masterfrom
MikeMcC399:add/ubuntu-26.04

Conversation

@MikeMcC399

@MikeMcC399 MikeMcC399 commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Situation

Change

A matrix entry ubuntu-26.04 is added to the workflow .github/workflows/example-basic.yml jobs basic and basic-npm-cache to demonstrate the capability of Cypress to run under this OS version. This is in addition to the ubuntu-22.04 and ubuntu-24.04 matrix entries in the workflow.

Other workflows are not changed at this time.


Note

Low Risk
CI-only matrix expansion in a demo workflow; no application or action runtime logic changes.

Overview
Adds ubuntu-26.04 to the OS matrix in .github/workflows/example-basic.yml for the basic and basic-npm-cache jobs, alongside the existing Ubuntu 22.04/24.04 entries. Each new matrix row runs the same Cypress example steps on GitHub’s preview Ubuntu 26.04 runner to show the action works on that image.

No other workflows are updated in this PR.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8d85ea9. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@cypress-app-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@MikeMcC399 MikeMcC399 self-assigned this Jun 12, 2026
@MikeMcC399 MikeMcC399 added the type: enhancement New feature or request label Jun 12, 2026
@MikeMcC399
MikeMcC399 marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2026 17:11
@MikeMcC399
MikeMcC399 requested a review from mschile June 12, 2026 17:11
@mschile
mschile merged commit baefc71 into cypress-io:master Jun 15, 2026
89 checks passed
@MikeMcC399
MikeMcC399 deleted the add/ubuntu-26.04 branch June 15, 2026 17:43
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is included in version 7.4.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants