Skip to content

test: add arm images to example-basic workflow#1794

Merged
mschile merged 3 commits into
cypress-io:masterfrom
MikeMcC399:add/arm-images-to-basic
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

test: add arm images to example-basic workflow#1794
mschile merged 3 commits into
cypress-io:masterfrom
MikeMcC399:add/arm-images-to-basic

Conversation

@MikeMcC399

@MikeMcC399 MikeMcC399 commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Situation

Change

Add matrix entries for the non-preview Arm64 runner images:

  • ubuntu-24.04-arm
  • ubuntu-22.04-arm
  • windows-11-arm

to the workflow .github/workflows/example-basic.yml jobs basic and basic-npm-cache to demonstrate the capability of the Cypress GitHub Action to run under these OS versions.


Note

Low Risk
CI-only matrix expansion in an example workflow; no production code, auth, or data handling changes.

Overview
Expands the example-basic CI matrix so Cypress runs on GitHub’s mainstream Arm64 runners, not only x64.

Both basic and basic-npm-cache now include ubuntu-22.04-arm, ubuntu-24.04-arm, and windows-11-arm alongside the existing OS labels, demonstrating the action on these images without changing test steps or action inputs.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit d172320. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@cypress-app-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@MikeMcC399 MikeMcC399 added type: enhancement New feature or request tests labels Jun 15, 2026
@MikeMcC399 MikeMcC399 self-assigned this Jun 15, 2026
@MikeMcC399
MikeMcC399 marked this pull request as ready for review June 15, 2026 09:31
@MikeMcC399
MikeMcC399 requested a review from mschile June 15, 2026 09:32
@mschile
mschile merged commit 693dc5a into cypress-io:master Jun 15, 2026
94 checks passed
@MikeMcC399
MikeMcC399 deleted the add/arm-images-to-basic branch June 16, 2026 05:49
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is included in version 7.4.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants