-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
🛡️ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix XSS in ResearchConsentForm #360
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
daggerstuff
wants to merge
4
commits into
staging
Choose a base branch
from
security/xss-research-consent-form-13835054143899157276
base: staging
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+66
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c33eaae
🛡️ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix XSS vulnerability in ResearchConsentForm
google-labs-jules[bot] 6908c35
🛡️ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix XSS in ResearchConsentForm and fix failing CI…
google-labs-jules[bot] 23b2628
Fix XSS vulnerability in ResearchConsentForm using isomorphic-dompurify
google-labs-jules[bot] 8a6be17
Fix XSS vulnerability in ResearchConsentForm using isomorphic-dompurify
google-labs-jules[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DOMPurify.sanitize()is a good fix, but the current usage leaves a couple of sharp edges:typeof window) is harder to reason about and can be wasteful for large documents. If this ever renders in a non-browser environment, it will also silently render an empty document.Consider computing the sanitized HTML once (memoized) and applying a stricter DOMPurify config.
Suggestion
Refactor to sanitize with an explicit HTML-only profile and memoize the result (and avoid silently blanking the document in non-window contexts):
If you must support SSR/non-DOM execution, prefer an SSR-safe setup (e.g., dynamic import in
useEffect, or an isomorphic DOMPurify wrapper) rather than''.Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you’d like me to add a commit with this refactor.