Skip to content

Bump iceberg version from 1.6.0 to 1.7.2 - #132

Open
abolisetti wants to merge 1 commit into
databricks:masterfrom
abolisetti:chore/bump_iceberg_version
Open

Bump iceberg version from 1.6.0 to 1.7.2#132
abolisetti wants to merge 1 commit into
databricks:masterfrom
abolisetti:chore/bump_iceberg_version

Conversation

@abolisetti

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We bump to 1.7.2 instead of 1.7.0 because of Connection Pool Shutdown errors described in 1.7.0, which were reverted in 1.7.2

We bump to 1.7.2 instead of 1.7.0 because of Connection
Pool Shutdown errors described in [1.7.0], which were reverted
in [1.7.2]

[1.7.0]: apache/iceberg#11633
[1.7.2]: apache/iceberg#11858
@abolisetti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@sullis Can you take a look?

@abolisetti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

or @nastra

@nastra

nastra commented Mar 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

hey @abolisetti the iceberg-rest-image now moved over into the Iceberg repo and is available at https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/main/docker/iceberg-rest-fixture/Dockerfile

@abolisetti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@nastra

hey @abolisetti the iceberg-rest-image now moved over into the Iceberg repo and is available at https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/main/docker/iceberg-rest-fixture/Dockerfile

Would it still be possible to merge this, as this pipeline is still publishing the docker image, and I will need to spend some more time figuring what needs to be done get the image from iceberg directly. Specifically I need to verify if bumping this iceberg version will fix the errors we have been seeing

@Fokko

Fokko commented Apr 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@abolisetti This is now part of the official Iceberg repository: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/main/docker/iceberg-rest-fixture

The images are hosted here: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/iceberg-rest-fixture/tags

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants