Second Try: Environment: improve/fix getting sys.prefix #1176
Merged
davidhalter merged 2 commits intomasterfrom Jul 15, 2018
Merged
Second Try: Environment: improve/fix getting sys.prefix #1176davidhalter merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
davidhalter merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
It only takes `executable` and gets all the information from the subprocess directly. Fixes #1107.
The issue was that if something changed about the environment (e.g. version switch) or sys.path change, re-creating the environment was possible, but did not involve the change. The environments have now a __del__ function that deletes the subprocess after every time an Environment is garbage collected.
davidhalter
changed the title
Contributor
|
LGTM, rebasing on master should fix AppVeyor then (py33), no? |
1 task
Owner
Author
|
The PR passed, it's only the branch that failed, so I guess it was fixed by rebasing it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of #1108 I propose this change. It involves pretty much all of what @blueyed did there, but with a different approach about creating subprocesses. I think I cleaned up a mistake we made.
The issue was that if something changed about the environment (e.g. version
switch) or sys.path change, re-creating the environment was possible, but did
not involve the change. The environments have now a
__del__function thatdeletes the subprocess after every time an Environment is garbage collected.