Add Third-Party Package Compatibility Test#1
Conversation
|
Thanks for the contribution. The workflow is useful, but I do not want to merge this as-is because ClawGuard docs should avoid implying endorsement of a third-party package. Please update the PR to:
Once those are addressed, I’m happy to review again. |
|
Thanks for the clear review. I am affiliated with TweetClaw/Xquik and maintain the I pushed
Validation:
|
|
Rebased this PR onto the current main branch after the validation docs moved under docs/internal. The package compatibility section now lives in docs/internal/REAL_WORLD_VALIDATION.md and keeps the configurable PACKAGE example plus the non-endorsement disclaimer. Validation on the updated branch:
|
|
Thanks for the review. I am affiliated with @xquik/tweetclaw and maintain the package, so I revised the section to avoid any implied ClawGuard endorsement. Changes pushed in 72bb535:
|
|
All 6 requested changes remain live in signed commit I rebuilt the complete change from current The independent repairs fix 21 moved-document links, constrain test discovery to test files, and clear 5 existing ESLint defects. Fresh validation passed with 538 tests, ESLint, coverage, link integrity, the real package scan command, and |
6b23a5e to
1e4cd14
Compare
Summary
PACKAGE="@scope/package@version"as the configurable default and keep TweetClaw only as a commented example.docs/internal/.Maintainer feedback addressed
npm packoutput visible.public archive or local ClawHub installwording.Current upstream reconciliation
maincommitbd3e655.Validation
Xquik is an independent third-party service. Not affiliated with X Corp. "Twitter" and "X" are trademarks of X Corp.