Skip to content

docs: clarify why LFM 2.5 uses 10:6 not 5:3 in §4.5 #85

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
devlux76 wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

docs: clarify why LFM 2.5 uses 10:6 not 5:3 in §4.5 #85

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions PARAMETER_GOLF.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -265,8 +265,11 @@ for two reasons:

### 4.5 Geode-derived layer layout

LFM 2.5's 10:6 CfC:GQA ratio was found empirically. The Geode factorization
(§D-4.1) provides a principled derivation that eliminates the guesswork.
LFM 2.5's 10:6 CfC:GQA ratio was found empirically. Note that 10:6 cannot be
reduced to 5:3: the numbers are absolute layer counts (10 CfC + 6 GQA = 16 layers
total), not a bare ratio. Reducing to 5:3 would describe a different 8-layer
model, halving the depth. The Geode factorization (§D-4.1) provides a principled
derivation that eliminates the guesswork.

The generating function for Q²'s transition sequences:

Expand Down
Loading