-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 221
[Bug]: Run/job status in UI/CLI is shown as provisioning instead of pulling
#2834
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
peterschmidt85
merged 1 commit into
master
from
2830-bug-runjob-status-in-uicli-is-shown-as-provisioning-instead-of-pulling
Jun 23, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For multi-job runs, it can be misleading to rely solely on the status of the first job.
Consider a two-replica service. If the first replica is
pullingand the second isrunning, the current implementation will set the run status message topulling.However, if the first replica is
runningand the second ispulling, the message will berunning.This inconsistency is misleading because the replicas are supposed to have equal importance.
I can suggest to only rely on the job status for single-job runs. In multi-job runs, job statuses will not affect the run status message.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, merged without! Will fix separately!