Match the Behavior of perfect-freehand#1
Open
CJendantix wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
|
Just wanted to note that some of those issues were fixed in this fork of freedraw, the perfect_freehand crate. (Note, unfortunately there is nothing in there to signal that is a fork) I mean, at least two issues isn't fixed in there. When handling of negative thinning, and how the first pressure is generated for input without pressure, this PR is closer to upstream perfect-freehand than the perfect_freehand crate. So maybe @CJendantix, publish this as another crate on crates.io? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was planning on using this library, but noticed that its output was quite strange and did not match the output of the original ts library. This is my attempt at resolving that.
Changes
perfect-freehand