Make .arrow() from relation return record batch reader#32
Merged
Conversation
|
Is this going to be an API change because some of us are using arrow() to get arrow tables. |
evertlammerts
force-pushed
the
arrow_relations
branch
from
f847302 to
76a2ce2
Compare
Member
Author
Yes, this will be a breaking change in the next release (1.4.0). You can still materialize a complete table by calling |
|
Okay, thanks very much! |
evertlammerts
force-pushed
the
arrow_relations
branch
from
76a2ce2 to
82e9edf
Compare
evertlammerts
force-pushed
the
arrow_relations
branch
from
82e9edf to
03e273b
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
port of duckdb/duckdb#18742
also see duckdb/duckdb#18642