Point the documentation at 0.1.0a8, and stop calling released work unreleased - #21
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…released The image `0.1.0a8` is published and this repository's own documentation was still pinning `0.1.0a7` and describing two shipped features as unbuilt. Both halves are fixed together because they fail together: `published-surface.json` is recorded from the image, the pins name the image, and a tree with one moved and not the other is red. `published-surface.json` now records 28 commands read from `ghcr.io/easybytehub/hullwork:0.1.0a8`, up from 26. Pins moved: `README.md`, `docker-compose.yml`, `docs/install.md`, `PRIVACY.md`. Anyone following the install instructions before this pulled the previous release. Three documents described as pending what had just shipped: - `README.md` said only the first of the three signal rows was in a release. Two are. Its error tracker row described Sentry's route as not landed yet; it now describes both routes together, with the gap they share — neither verifies a signature — rather than framing it as Sentry's alone. - `docs/status.md` had spent a day naming the dependency signal's *state* and deliberately not its *command*, because a command a reader cannot run is an invitation to type it and be told it does not exist. It is nameable now for one reason: it is in an image you can pull. What the name does not say has been added — four real third-party repositories measured before release, one clean verdict, and that ratio is the feature rather than a defect in it. A tool that answered all four would be lying about three. - `docs/what-hullwork-is.md` likewise, with the note that the rule did not soften when the release landed: the row changed because the artefact did. The guard was checked by putting one pin back to `0.1.0a7`: it fails naming the document and the stale version. Signed-off-by: Javier Miralles Rancaño <68760931+FlagshipDev@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The image
0.1.0a8is published and this repository's own documentation was still pinning0.1.0a7and describing two shipped features as unbuilt. Both halves are fixed together becausethey fail together:
published-surface.jsonis recorded from the image, the pins name the image,and a tree with one moved and not the other is red.
published-surface.jsonnow records 28 commands read fromghcr.io/easybytehub/hullwork:0.1.0a8,up from 26.
Pins moved:
README.md,docker-compose.yml,docs/install.md,PRIVACY.md. Anyone followingthe install instructions before this pulled the previous release.
Three documents described as pending what had just shipped:
README.mdsaid only the first of the three signal rows was in a release. Two are. Its errortracker row described Sentry's route as not landed yet; it now describes both routes together,
with the gap they share — neither verifies a signature — rather than framing it as Sentry's alone.
docs/status.mdhad spent a day naming the dependency signal's state and deliberately not itscommand, because a command a reader cannot run is an invitation to type it and be told it does
not exist. It is nameable now for one reason: it is in an image you can pull. What the name does
not say has been added — four real third-party repositories measured before release, one clean
verdict, and that ratio is the feature rather than a defect in it. A tool that answered all four
would be lying about three.
docs/what-hullwork-is.mdlikewise, with the note that the rule did not soften when the releaselanded: the row changed because the artefact did.
The guard was checked by putting one pin back to
0.1.0a7: it fails naming the document and thestale version.
Signed-off-by: Javier Miralles Rancaño 68760931+FlagshipDev@users.noreply.github.com