docs(qa): flag ow-v103-reval scorecard row as superseded (ran on the dead Dal, #305) - #334
Conversation
…; canon-PC baseline owed on a living PC
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR updates the QA scorecard to document that the ChangesQA Scorecard Documentation Update
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Comment |
Docs-only data-integrity correction. The
ow-v103-revalrow inqa/SCORECARD.mdrecords story 4.1 / mech 4.1 as a post-v1.0.3 canon-PC revalidation — but per #305, Dal Lightspark is canonically DEAD, so that run was on a dead, portrait-less PC. Its scores are SUSPECT as a clean canon-PC baseline.Appends a
⚠ [SUPERSEDED — #305]note to that row's notes cell so no future agent cites 4.1/4.1 as the canon-PC baseline. Clarifies that the engine-plumbing validations still hold (the #162 kind="player"⇒in-party invariant, clock/travel/world-peopled are char-agnostic) and that the clean revalidation duo is OWED on a LIVING canon PC via the #329 living fixture.No scores rewritten (the run happened; only its interpretation is corrected). No contract/engine/asset changes. Off
origin/mainvia a worktree (shared checkout untouched).Refs #305, #329, #162.
Summary by CodeRabbit