qa(scores): RRI-25e55fa row (5.5/10, post-viewer-fix, +1.0 same-ruler) - #877
Conversation
…, +1.0 vs RRI-5e98e6f) zero_critical FLIPPED to PASS (optimizer item-inspector crit resolved in live play via #872). All 5 personas zero-crit, 0 gave up, arc 5/5, behavioral GREEN, sat 6.6->6.8, story 3.9->4.2 (within 0.1 of gate). mech 2.6 = single-duo angry-dm variance (smoke 3.9). native_gate + image_render still FAIL = measurement-lane (Mac part-A deferred). Same ruler as RRI-5e98e6f = direct compare. RRI arc this session: rc2 2.7 -> 4.5 -> 5.5.
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughOne new scored run row ( QA Scores Ledger Row Addition
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Comment |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e3343de0cb
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| | Run | When | SHA | Build date | Surface | DM model | Actor model | Scorer | Ruler | Lens ruler | RC | Methodology | Story | Mech | AngryDM | Behav | Sat | RRI | Crit | Img% | s/beat | cold-open s | turns/beat | Pass | Source | Notes | | ||
| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | ||
| | RRI-25e55fa | 2026-06-14T18:45:14Z | 25e55fa | 2026-06-14 | GUI-built-app | opus | | | sc_15c2436b4267 | | | gate-partA-skipped | 4.2 | 2.6 | | | 6.8 | 5.5 | 0 | 0% | 135 | 156.6 | 8.2 | FAIL | VM 5-persona part-B @25e55fa | Post-viewer-fix re-sweep (3 viewer PRs #872/#873/#875 on top of the 31 engine PRs). RRI 5.5/10 (6/11) vs run RRI-5e98e6f (4.5) — SAME ruler, DIRECT compare. zero_critical FLIPPED to PASS: optimizer's item-inspector crit (Studded Leather no-AC) resolved in live play (#872 renders the engine Item stats). ALL 5 personas zero-crit, 0 gave up, arc 5/5, behavioral GREEN, sat 6.6->6.8 (newbie 8/veteran 7/adversarial 6/narrative 8/optimizer 5). story 3.9->4.2 (within 0.1 of the 4.3 gate). mech 3.3->2.6 = single-duo angry-dm variance (the audit's own finding: one 6-beat duo is noise; smoke duo this SHA was 3.9) — needs a multi-duo median. STILL-FAIL: native_gate + image_render = measurement-lane gaps (Mac part-A handoff DEFERRED, Mac too disk/mem-constrained); cross_persona_sat 6.8 (<7, optimizer self-reports 5 surfacing the NEXT min-maxer depth layer: subclass-option completeness, class-feature rules inspector, weapon range field, hit-dice-spend UI). cold-open held 156.6s (latency win persists). | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new row’s Behav cell is empty even though the same row’s notes state behavioral GREEN; the inserted qa/scores.db row also has behavioral set to NULL. When readers or qa/scores_db.py --compare --compare-rc-surface use the structured columns instead of the prose notes, this run incorrectly looks like it lacks behavioral-gate evidence, which undermines the 6/11 gate accounting and future trend comparisons.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Data-only. RRI 5.5/10 (6/11) vs RRI-5e98e6f 4.5 — same ruler, direct compare. zero_critical flipped to PASS (optimizer item-inspector crit gone). story 4.2 (within 0.1 of 4.3). Remaining FAILs: native_gate+image_render (measurement-lane, part-A deferred), cross_persona_sat 6.8, mech 2.6 (single-duo variance).
Summary by CodeRabbit