Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 727ec7d The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Summary of ChangesHello @aguxez, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on enriching the event data sent to Segment by adding a 'source' property to key user actions. This enhancement allows for a more comprehensive understanding of where user interactions originate, which is crucial for improved analytics and decision-making regarding user acquisition and engagement strategies. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
WalkthroughThreads the credential Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API as Server API
participant DB as Database
participant Hook as Hook (panda/activity)
participant Segment as Analytics
Client->>API: issue/transaction/update request
API->>DB: fetch credential (include source)
DB-->>API: credential { ..., source }
API->>Hook: invoke flow (pass card, credential.source)
Hook->>Segment: track(event { ..., source })
Hook-->>API: flow result
API-->>Client: response
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
✅ All tests passed. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
server/utils/segment.ts (1)
42-52: 🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial
OnrampandRampAccountstill use inlinesourceinstead ofSourceProperty.For consistency with the other events, these two could also use
SourceProperty &to keep DRY.♻️ Suggested refactor
| { event: "Onramp"; - properties: { + properties: SourceProperty & { currency: string; fiatAmount: number; provider: "bridge" | "manteca"; - source: null | string; usdcAmount: number; }; } - | { event: "RampAccount"; properties: { provider: "bridge" | "manteca"; source: null | string } } + | { event: "RampAccount"; properties: SourceProperty & { provider: "bridge" | "manteca" } }
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@server/api/card.ts`:
- Line 233: The GET handler is selecting credential.source (columns: { account,
pandaId, source }) but never uses it; remove source from the selected columns to
avoid unnecessary data retrieval. Update the query that builds the projection
(the object with columns: { account: true, pandaId: true, source: true }) to
only include account and pandaId, ensuring no other code in the GET handler
(e.g., response construction or tracking/event emission) expects source.
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds a source property to various Segment events, enhancing analytics by tracking user origin. The changes are consistently applied across multiple files, fetching the source from the database and propagating it to the tracking events. The type definitions for these events have been updated accordingly. The implementation is clean, correct, and follows existing patterns. I also appreciate the minor unrelated type additions, which improve code clarity. Overall, this is a solid contribution.
aguxez
force-pushed
the
source-events
branch
from
95ccb74 to
909de97
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
server/utils/segment.ts (1)
42-52: 🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial
OnrampandRampAccountstill use inlinesource: null | stringinstead ofSourceProperty.These two events define
sourceinline rather than using the newSourcePropertytype. If the semantic meaning ofsourceis the same (credential origin), consider unifying them withSourcePropertyfor consistency. Ifsourcehas a different meaning for ramp events (e.g., referral/provider context), the current split is fine — just worth confirming.
aguxez
force-pushed
the
source-events
branch
from
909de97 to
91082b4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
server/utils/segment.ts (1)
42-52: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 MajorInconsistency:
OnrampandRampAccountstill inlinesourceinstead of usingSourceProperty.These two events define
source: null | stringdirectly rather than using the newSourcePropertytype. This was presumably the pre-existing pattern, but now thatSourcePropertyexists, aligning them would be consistent.♻️ Suggested fix
| { event: "Onramp"; - properties: { + properties: SourceProperty & { currency: string; fiatAmount: number; provider: "bridge" | "manteca"; - source: null | string; usdcAmount: number; }; } - | { event: "RampAccount"; properties: { provider: "bridge" | "manteca"; source: null | string } } + | { event: "RampAccount"; properties: SourceProperty & { provider: "bridge" | "manteca" } }
aguxez
force-pushed
the
source-events
branch
from
91082b4 to
727ec7d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
server/utils/segment.ts (1)
42-52: 🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial
OnrampandRampAccountstill duplicatesource: null | stringinline instead of usingSourceProperty.For consistency with all the other events now using
SourceProperty, these two should be refactored to use it as well.♻️ Proposed fix
| { event: "Onramp"; - properties: { + properties: SourceProperty & { currency: string; fiatAmount: number; provider: "bridge" | "manteca"; - source: null | string; usdcAmount: number; }; } - | { event: "RampAccount"; properties: { provider: "bridge" | "manteca"; source: null | string } } + | { event: "RampAccount"; properties: SourceProperty & { provider: "bridge" | "manteca" } }
![devin-ai-integration[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/811515?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit