🔒️ server: prevent challenge replay on failed auth#776
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: dc47522 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Summary of ChangesHello @cruzdanilo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly improves the security of the authentication process by addressing a potential vulnerability where authentication challenges could be replayed after a failed attempt. The changes ensure that once a challenge is retrieved for validation, it is immediately invalidated and removed from storage, preventing its reuse. This enhancement fortifies the system against specific types of attack vectors and is supported by comprehensive new test cases. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
WalkthroughAuth and registration handlers now use Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Server
participant Redis
Client->>Server: GET/POST /auth or /registration (sessionId)
Server->>Redis: getdel(sessionId)
Redis-->>Server: challenge string or null (key deleted)
alt challenge present
Server->>Server: validate challenge / SIWE / WebAuthn
Server->>Server: create credentials / issue session
Server-->>Client: 200 success
else missing or replayed
Server-->>Client: 400/401 error
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request correctly addresses a security vulnerability where authentication challenges were not being invalidated upon failed authentication attempts or during the SIWE signup flow. By moving the challenge deletion to the beginning of the authentication process, the code ensures that each challenge is strictly single-use, preventing replay attacks. The implementation is clean, and the added tests provide good coverage for the changes.
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #776 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.59% 68.69% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 207 207
Lines 7005 7027 +22
Branches 2189 2199 +10
==========================================
+ Hits 4805 4827 +22
- Misses 2010 2013 +3
+ Partials 190 187 -3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
6f51716 to
d475189
Compare
75d1df3 to
64debe7
Compare
64debe7 to
21a790f
Compare
21a790f to
eb235fe
Compare
eb235fe to
d991c9d
Compare
d991c9d to
dc47522
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests
Chores