Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 24, 2024. It is now read-only.

[Snyk] Security upgrade axios from 1.7.3 to 1.7.4#29

Open
therealbenpai wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-82b560491fbfd252591a9109af9c182c
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade axios from 1.7.3 to 1.7.4#29
therealbenpai wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-82b560491fbfd252591a9109af9c182c

Conversation

@therealbenpai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
  • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-7361793
  296  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)

@therealbenpai therealbenpai requested review from a team as code owners August 15, 2024 04:10
@deepsource-io

deepsource-io Bot commented Aug 15, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 533490b..301a326. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants