ENNEAGRAM-LLMS-FULL-RELEASE-READINESS-02: re-evaluate Enneagram llms-full evidence gate

[fermatmind]

What changed

• Generated the read-only Enneagram llms-full readiness report for the 116 canonical Enneagram assets.
• Reconciled stale train ledger entries for PR ENNEAGRAM-EN13-EVIDENCE-REFRESH-READBACK-REPAIR-01: normalize evidence refresh readback #3020, PR ENNEAGRAM-LLMS-TXT-PRODUCTION-REVALIDATION-01: revalidate Enneagram llms.txt release #3022, and the EN13 evidence CMS refresh current-state proof.
• Tightened the manifest dependency boundary so llms-full readiness depends on llms.txt production revalidation and EN13 evidence CMS refresh, not only the earlier code upgrade.

Why

• llms-full release must be evaluated separately from llms.txt after evidence/provenance refresh and production feed revalidation.
• The report records GO_FOR_SEPARATE_LLMS_FULL_AUTHORIZATION while preserving zero-write boundaries.

Validation

• ruby -e "require 'yaml'; YAML.load_file('docs/codex/pr-train.yaml')"\n- python3 -m json.tool docs/codex/pr-train-state.json >/dev/null\n- python3 -m json.tool generated/enneagram-llms-full-release-readiness-02/readiness-report.json >/dev/null\n- custom JSON assertions for 116 targets, 116 llms.txt Enneagram URLs, 0 llms-full Enneagram URLs, expected locale/entity distribution, zero safety counters, and zero side effects\n- changed-file scope validation\n- git diff --check\n\n## Deferred items\n- No llms-full release was executed.\n- No CMS/DB write, eligibility change, Search Queue action, IndexNow submission, cache warm, deployment, secrets, or permissions change was performed.\n- ENNEAGRAM-LLMS-FULL-RELEASE-01 still requires separate exact deployed-SHA authorization after this PR is merged.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: db3eec8d5c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Record the actual readiness commit SHA

This ledger transition records commit_sha as c64f393..., but the commit under review is f30f942...; c64f393... is a sibling of this commit rather than an ancestor and its tree still contains the earlier stale ledger value. Any downstream PR-train audit or dependency check that follows the recorded SHA will inspect the wrong state and fail to reproduce the readiness record for this change, so this should point at the actual reviewed/branch-head commit SHA before the readiness item is used as evidence.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.