chore(skills): sync provisioned skills#996
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. 1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in: 59 minutes Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Comment |
Web Tooling Benchmark
18 pinned Web Tooling workloads; 18 workloads produced at least one Goccia sample. Raw results from 1 sample per workload; full stdout/stderr for failures and min/max/CV stay in the |
Suite TimingTest Runner (interpreted: 11,517 passed; bytecode: 11,517 passed)
MemoryGC rows aggregate the main thread plus all worker thread-local GCs. Test runner worker shutdown frees thread-local heaps in bulk; that shutdown reclamation is not counted as GC collections or collected objects.
Benchmarks (interpreted: 439; bytecode: 439)
MemoryGC rows aggregate the main thread plus all worker thread-local GCs. Benchmark runner performs explicit between-file collections, so collection and collected-object counts can be much higher than the test runner.
Boot
Empty-script ( Measured on ubuntu-latest x64. |
Benchmark Results439 benchmarks · PR vs same-runner Interpreted: 🟢 60 improved · 🔴 50 regressed · 329 unchanged · avg -0.2% Typical per-run noise (median variance): interpreted ±1.7%, bytecode ±2.3%. Deltas within noise overlap and read as unchanged. arraybuffer.js — Interp: 🟢 1, 13 unch. · avg +0.8% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 13 unch. · avg -0.5%
arrays.js — Interp: 🟢 2, 17 unch. · avg +0.9% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 🔴 3, 15 unch. · avg +0.3%
async-await.js — Interp: 🟢 2, 4 unch. · avg +2.5% · Bytecode: 6 unch. · avg -2.2%
async-generators.js — Interp: 🔴 1, 1 unch. · avg -0.0% · Bytecode: 2 unch. · avg +0.3%
atomics.js — Interp: 🔴 1, 5 unch. · avg -2.6% · Bytecode: 🔴 3, 3 unch. · avg -4.0%
base64.js — Interp: 🟢 1, 9 unch. · avg -0.4% · Bytecode: 🔴 1, 9 unch. · avg +1.2%
classes.js — Interp: 🟢 2, 🔴 6, 23 unch. · avg -1.2% · Bytecode: 🟢 3, 28 unch. · avg +0.4%
closures.js — Interp: 🔴 1, 10 unch. · avg -1.2% · Bytecode: 11 unch. · avg +0.2%
collections.js — Interp: 🟢 2, 🔴 1, 9 unch. · avg +0.6% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 11 unch. · avg -0.5%
csv.js — Interp: 🟢 3, 🔴 1, 9 unch. · avg +2.1% · Bytecode: 13 unch. · avg -3.5%
destructuring.js — Interp: 🟢 1, 🔴 2, 19 unch. · avg +0.2% · Bytecode: 22 unch. · avg -0.0%
fibonacci.js — Interp: 🔴 1, 7 unch. · avg -0.5% · Bytecode: 8 unch. · avg -0.8%
float16array.js — Interp: 🟢 3, 🔴 5, 24 unch. · avg -0.4% · Bytecode: 🟢 3, 29 unch. · avg +2.0%
for-in/for-in.js — Interp: 3 unch. · avg +0.5% · Bytecode: 3 unch. · avg +3.0%
for-of.js — Interp: 🟢 7 · avg +8.5% · Bytecode: 🔴 1, 6 unch. · avg +0.3%
generators.js — Interp: 🔴 3, 1 unch. · avg -5.4% · Bytecode: 🔴 1, 3 unch. · avg -0.1%
intl.js — Interp: 🔴 1, 5 unch. · avg -2.9% · Bytecode: 🔴 2, 4 unch. · avg -0.1%
iterators.js — Interp: 🟢 5, 🔴 2, 35 unch. · avg +0.8% · Bytecode: 🟢 2, 🔴 7, 33 unch. · avg -2.8%
json.js — Interp: 🟢 4, 🔴 1, 18 unch. · avg +1.3% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 🔴 1, 21 unch. · avg -0.9%
jsx.jsx — Interp: 🔴 6, 15 unch. · avg -4.4% · Bytecode: 21 unch. · avg +0.0%
modules.js — Interp: 🟢 1, 8 unch. · avg +2.4% · Bytecode: 9 unch. · avg -1.0%
numbers.js — Interp: 🟢 1, 11 unch. · avg -0.2% · Bytecode: 🔴 2, 10 unch. · avg -1.4%
objects.js — Interp: 🔴 1, 6 unch. · avg -1.4% · Bytecode: 7 unch. · avg -0.6%
promises.js — Interp: 🟢 1, 11 unch. · avg +1.0% · Bytecode: 🔴 4, 8 unch. · avg -1.8%
property-access.js — Interp: 🟢 1, 4 unch. · avg +2.7% · Bytecode: 5 unch. · avg +1.7%
regexp.js — Interp: 🔴 3, 10 unch. · avg -1.8% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 12 unch. · avg +1.5%
strings.js — Interp: 🟢 6, 🔴 1, 12 unch. · avg +3.0% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 🔴 1, 17 unch. · avg +0.7%
temporal.js — Interp: 🔴 1, 5 unch. · avg -1.9% · Bytecode: 🔴 1, 5 unch. · avg -1.1%
tsv.js — Interp: 🟢 1, 8 unch. · avg -1.7% · Bytecode: 🟢 2, 🔴 2, 5 unch. · avg -1.4%
typed-arrays.js — Interp: 🟢 8, 🔴 8, 6 unch. · avg -12.5% · Bytecode: 🟢 7, 🔴 3, 12 unch. · avg +2.3%
uint8array-encoding.js — Interp: 🟢 6, 🔴 3, 9 unch. · avg +8.9% · Bytecode: 🟢 3, 🔴 4, 11 unch. · avg +2.6%
weak-collections.js — Interp: 🟢 2, 🔴 1, 12 unch. · avg -0.1% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 🔴 8, 6 unch. · avg -20.5%
Deterministic profile diffDeterministic profile diff: no significant changes. Measured on ubuntu-latest x64. Each PR run also builds the |
JetStream 3 Performance Barometer
Geomean reference ratio: QuickJS 27.40×; Node.js 298.12×. 1.00× means aligned; values above 1.00× mean Goccia was proportionally slower after normalizing JetStream’s higher-is-better score. This is a directional barometer across runtimes with different goals, not a product ranking. Raw samples and failure details remain in the |
AWFY Results
Geomean Ratios
14 pinned AWFY benchmarks. Medians from 5 interleaved samples per engine; raw JSON includes min/max/CV and is attached as the |
test262 Conformance
Areas closest to 100%
Per-test deltas (+0 / -0 / timeout +0 / -2)Resolved timeouts (2):
Steady-state failures and timeouts are non-blocking; PASS → non-timeout failure transitions fail the conformance gate. Measured on ubuntu-latest x64, bytecode mode. Areas grouped by the first two test262 path components; minimum 25 attempted tests, areas already at 100% excluded. Δ vs main compares against the most recent cached |
Summary
Testing
Additional verification: scripts/test-skill-inventory-validator.js (6 assertions) and live inventory validation for all 21 lock-managed skills.