docs: plan Codex GUI restart utility#65
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 55 minutes and 12 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR updates planning documentation for Codex GUI restart coordination. It adds Milestone 11 roadmap items for restart tools and a narrow skill, clarifies operational responsibility split between the installed app and utilities plugin, specifies MCP API surface and agent skill rules, and defines runtime contracts and implementation tracking. ChangesCodex GUI Restart Coordination Planning
Estimated Code Review Effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3fe0d53b3e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
gaelic-ghost
force-pushed
the
docs/codex-gui-restart-plan
branch
from
3fe0d53 to
6831bd7
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
plugins/codex-utilities/docs/desktop-bridge-mcp-skill-plan.md (1)
147-149: 💤 Low valueConsider minor rewording to reduce repetition.
The three consecutive bullets starting with "Whether" create slight stylistic repetition. This is a very minor point, but you could rephrase one or two for variety if desired:
- "Whether a supported Codex App Server or GUI endpoint can report thread status outside the current assistant turn."
- "Should
when-idleuse persistent app state or remain memory-only until the coordinator is proven?"🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@plugins/codex-utilities/docs/desktop-bridge-mcp-skill-plan.md` around lines 147 - 149, Reword the repeated bullets for variety: change the first sentence "Whether a supported Codex App Server or GUI endpoint can report thread status outside the current assistant turn." to an active question or alternative phrasing (e.g., "Can a supported Codex App Server or GUI endpoint report thread status outside the current assistant turn?") and rephrase the second bullet about when-idle to match the suggested form ("Should `when-idle` use persistent app state or remain memory-only until the coordinator is proven?"), keeping references to `when-idle` and "Codex App Server/GUI endpoint" so the meaning and identifiers remain clear.Source: Linters/SAST tools
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@plugins/codex-utilities/docs/desktop-bridge-mcp-skill-plan.md`:
- Around line 147-149: Reword the repeated bullets for variety: change the first
sentence "Whether a supported Codex App Server or GUI endpoint can report thread
status outside the current assistant turn." to an active question or alternative
phrasing (e.g., "Can a supported Codex App Server or GUI endpoint report thread
status outside the current assistant turn?") and rephrase the second bullet
about when-idle to match the suggested form ("Should `when-idle` use persistent
app state or remain memory-only until the coordinator is proven?"), keeping
references to `when-idle` and "Codex App Server/GUI endpoint" so the meaning and
identifiers remain clear.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: b038dc3d-71e3-4a75-b7bb-e3f1e2ab140b
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
ROADMAP.mdplugins/codex-utilities/AGENTS.mdplugins/codex-utilities/docs/desktop-bridge-mcp-skill-plan.md
1 participant
Summary:
Verification:
Summary by CodeRabbit