Skip to content

fix(ci): update ospo-reusable-workflows org path in GitHub Actions#419

Merged
zkoppert merged 1 commit intogithub-community-projects:mainfrom
jmeridth:jm_fix_ospo_workflow_path
Mar 10, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): update ospo-reusable-workflows org path in GitHub Actions#419
zkoppert merged 1 commit intogithub-community-projects:mainfrom
jmeridth:jm_fix_ospo_workflow_path

Conversation

@jmeridth
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request

Proposed Changes

What

Updated all references to ospo-reusable-workflows from the github org to the github-community-projects org across three workflow files: auto-labeler, pr-title, and release.

Why

The ospo-reusable-workflows repository was moved from the github org to the github-community-projects org. The old references would cause workflow failures since the repository no longer exists at the previous path.

Notes

  • Pinned commit SHAs were intentionally left unchanged — the SHA references the same commit in the transferred repo
  • All four uses: directives across the three workflow files were updated
  • Trimmed pull request template a bit

Readiness Checklist

Author/Contributor

  • If documentation is needed for this change, has that been included in this pull request
  • run npm run lint and fix any linting issues that have been introduced
  • run npm run test and run tests

## What

Updated all references to ospo-reusable-workflows from the `github` org
to the `github-community-projects` org across three workflow files:
auto-labeler, pr-title, and release.

## Why

The ospo-reusable-workflows repository was moved from the `github` org
to the `github-community-projects` org. The old references would cause
workflow failures since the repository no longer exists at the previous path.

## Notes

- Pinned commit SHAs were intentionally left unchanged — the SHA references the same commit in the transferred repo
- All four `uses:` directives across the three workflow files were updated
- Updated pull request template, trimmed it a bit

Signed-off-by: jmeridth <jmeridth@gmail.com>
@jmeridth jmeridth requested review from a team as code owners March 10, 2026 07:21
@wrslatz
Copy link
Contributor

wrslatz commented Mar 10, 2026

If we're able to view these workflows in the new org, that will be really helpful for auditing and understanding them, as well as contributing.

@jmeridth
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zkoppert @wrslatz unfortunately, currently the active branch protection/ruleset will need to be edited one of two ways to allow this to merge:

  • temp bypass to allow merging
  • temp remove auto label and pr title validation checks as required

@wrslatz
Copy link
Contributor

wrslatz commented Mar 10, 2026

@zkoppert @wrslatz unfortunately, currently the active branch protection/ruleset will need to be edited one of two ways to allow this to merge:

  • temp bypass to allow merging
  • temp remove auto label and pr title validation checks as required

Don't think I have permissions for that. I think temp removing the checks makes sense if they're replaced in the new org location and would need changing anyway.

@zkoppert zkoppert merged commit b79966a into github-community-projects:main Mar 10, 2026
4 checks passed
@jmeridth jmeridth deleted the jm_fix_ospo_workflow_path branch March 10, 2026 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants