Conversation
|
@mraleph ? |
|
I will let @osa1 review once he has cycles. |
osa1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Most of the changes LGTM, but I'm not sure if the changes in coded_buffer_writer are safe (added an inline comment).
Secondly, we should land #816 first or opt-out from internal lints in the internal version (which I think makes sense given the package is third-party) and revert the CLs listed in #816.
I have no cycles to keep these two versions in sync and this kind of style changes (either in the internal version or open source) only make it difficult for actual users to make changes. For example #825 is for an internal user and we have to do those changes manually in the internal version to be able to test and actually use it. #790 is another example of a useful change.
|
@osa1 – now ready for your review! |
|
@osa1 – PTAL |
No description provided.