Skip to content

[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities#83

Open
snyk-io[bot] wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-9040d9e58aaf131c2f8b461ce4696cc2
Open

[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities#83
snyk-io[bot] wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-9040d9e58aaf131c2f8b461ce4696cc2

Conversation

@snyk-io
Copy link

@snyk-io snyk-io bot commented Mar 1, 2026

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score Upgrade
high severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JAVA-COMFASTERXMLJACKSONCORE-15365924
  170   com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core:
2.15.2 -> 2.18.6
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:
2.15.2 -> 2.18.6
No Path Found Proof of Concept

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: Medium

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

@snyk-io
Copy link
Author

snyk-io bot commented Mar 1, 2026

Merge Risk: Medium

This upgrade for jackson-core and jackson-databind spans several minor versions, introducing new features, performance improvements, and significant internal changes. While there are no direct API removals, the risk of behavioral changes requires verification.

Key Changes by Version:

  • Jackson 2.16: Introduced new configurable processing limits for maximum document length and property name length to enhance security against DoS attacks. [10, 14]
  • Jackson 2.17: Added the DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNEXPECTED_VIEW_PROPERTIES feature and delivered numerous bug fixes and performance improvements. [3, 12]
  • Jackson 2.18: This version contains a major internal rewrite of the POJO Property Introspection logic. [1, 7] While this was intended to fix long-standing bugs, it also introduced several regressions related to deserialization with @JsonCreator, Java Records, and Throwable subclasses that were subsequently fixed in patch releases. [2, 5] Upgrading to 2.18.6 includes these fixes, but the underlying changes are substantial.

Potential Impact:

  • Behavioral Changes: The property introspection rewrite in v2.18 is the primary source of risk. Applications with complex deserialization logic, especially those using custom creators (@JsonCreator), Java Records, or intricate object hierarchies, may be affected by subtle behavioral changes. [2, 5]
  • Environment Changes: For users of the jackson-module-kotlin, support for Kotlin version 1.7.x has been dropped. [1, 16]

Recommendation: This upgrade is assessed as MEDIUM risk. The internal changes are significant enough to warrant thorough regression testing, with a focus on complex object deserialization and validation scenarios to ensure that application behavior remains consistent.

Source: Jackson 2.16 Release Notes, Jackson 2.17 Release Notes, Jackson 2.18 Release Notes

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

@snyk-io
Copy link
Author

snyk-io bot commented Mar 1, 2026

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants