physicalmem: don't claim low addresses#2453
Open
zyuiop wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
2d3c070 to
cfe9c81
Compare
cfe9c81 to
cd32dc9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Benchmark Results
Details
| Benchmark | Current: cd32dc9 | Previous: a025f19 | Performance Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| startup_benchmark Build Time | 117.87 s |
116.82 s |
1.01 ❗ |
| startup_benchmark File Size | 0.73 MB |
0.77 MB |
0.95 ❗ |
| Startup Time - 1 core | 0.99 s (±0.02 s) |
1.00 s (±0.03 s) |
0.99 |
| Startup Time - 2 cores | 1.02 s (±0.04 s) |
1.04 s (±0.05 s) |
0.99 |
| Startup Time - 4 cores | 1.00 s (±0.03 s) |
1.02 s (±0.05 s) |
0.98 |
| multithreaded_benchmark Build Time | 115.36 s |
117.48 s |
0.98 ❗ |
| multithreaded_benchmark File Size | 0.87 MB |
0.84 MB |
1.04 ❗ |
| Multithreaded Pi Efficiency - 2 Threads | 92.91 % (±12.94 %) |
85.06 % (±19.28 %) |
1.09 |
| Multithreaded Pi Efficiency - 4 Threads | 45.17 % (±6.08 %) |
42.20 % (±9.32 %) |
1.07 |
| Multithreaded Pi Efficiency - 8 Threads | 24.92 % (±3.07 %) |
23.57 % (±5.00 %) |
1.06 |
| micro_benchmarks Build Time | 95.56 s |
92.09 s |
1.04 ❗ |
| micro_benchmarks File Size | 0.87 MB |
0.84 MB |
1.04 ❗ |
| Scheduling time - 1 thread | 72.40 ticks (±3.20 ticks) |
73.19 ticks (±3.39 ticks) |
0.99 |
| Scheduling time - 2 threads | 41.59 ticks (±4.17 ticks) |
44.10 ticks (±6.54 ticks) |
0.94 |
| Micro - Time for syscall (getpid) | 3.81 ticks (±0.21 ticks) |
3.09 ticks (±0.16 ticks) |
1.23 ❗ |
| Memcpy speed - (built_in) block size 4096 | 75000.07 MByte/s (±51754.39 MByte/s) |
73877.55 MByte/s (±50900.64 MByte/s) |
1.02 |
| Memcpy speed - (built_in) block size 1048576 | 29616.19 MByte/s (±24287.95 MByte/s) |
29621.41 MByte/s (±24412.82 MByte/s) |
1.00 |
| Memcpy speed - (built_in) block size 16777216 | 23553.80 MByte/s (±19423.97 MByte/s) |
26615.80 MByte/s (±21973.01 MByte/s) |
0.88 |
| Memset speed - (built_in) block size 4096 | 74964.56 MByte/s (±51730.73 MByte/s) |
74082.46 MByte/s (±51039.25 MByte/s) |
1.01 |
| Memset speed - (built_in) block size 1048576 | 30370.51 MByte/s (±24732.01 MByte/s) |
30381.08 MByte/s (±24836.90 MByte/s) |
1.00 |
| Memset speed - (built_in) block size 16777216 | 24294.07 MByte/s (±19934.39 MByte/s) |
27365.04 MByte/s (±22427.19 MByte/s) |
0.89 |
| Memcpy speed - (rust) block size 4096 | 66634.09 MByte/s (±46559.25 MByte/s) |
67998.13 MByte/s (±47775.53 MByte/s) |
0.98 |
| Memcpy speed - (rust) block size 1048576 | 29529.21 MByte/s (±24272.32 MByte/s) |
29415.03 MByte/s (±24216.28 MByte/s) |
1.00 |
| Memcpy speed - (rust) block size 16777216 | 24321.97 MByte/s (±20047.53 MByte/s) |
26645.15 MByte/s (±21980.78 MByte/s) |
0.91 |
| Memset speed - (rust) block size 4096 | 67055.71 MByte/s (±46853.50 MByte/s) |
68410.01 MByte/s (±48051.67 MByte/s) |
0.98 |
| Memset speed - (rust) block size 1048576 | 30297.78 MByte/s (±24714.98 MByte/s) |
30182.39 MByte/s (±24662.20 MByte/s) |
1.00 |
| Memset speed - (rust) block size 16777216 | 24920.48 MByte/s (±20396.08 MByte/s) |
27320.66 MByte/s (±22364.88 MByte/s) |
0.91 |
| alloc_benchmarks Build Time | 91.60 s |
91.56 s |
1.00 ❗ |
| alloc_benchmarks File Size | 0.81 MB |
0.85 MB |
0.96 ❗ |
| Allocations - Allocation success | 100.00 % |
100.00 % |
1 |
| Allocations - Deallocation success | 100.00 % |
100.00 % |
1 |
| Allocations - Pre-fail Allocations | 100.00 % |
100.00 % |
1 |
| Allocations - Average Allocation time | 4307.32 Ticks (±572.85 Ticks) |
4553.50 Ticks (±57.46 Ticks) |
0.95 |
| Allocations - Average Allocation time (no fail) | 4307.32 Ticks (±572.85 Ticks) |
4553.50 Ticks (±57.46 Ticks) |
0.95 |
| Allocations - Average Deallocation time | 676.00 Ticks (±102.89 Ticks) |
1035.15 Ticks (±129.57 Ticks) |
0.65 ❗ |
| mutex_benchmark Build Time | 93.45 s |
88.37 s |
1.06 ❗ |
| mutex_benchmark File Size | 0.88 MB |
0.84 MB |
1.04 ❗ |
| Mutex Stress Test Average Time per Iteration - 1 Threads | 14.00 ns (±0.69 ns) |
14.02 ns (±0.84 ns) |
1.00 |
| Mutex Stress Test Average Time per Iteration - 2 Threads | 16.20 ns (±10.70 ns) |
17.80 ns (±4.95 ns) |
0.91 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context
While working on patches for AMD SEV-SNP, we use the DeviceMapper with an offset early at boot to allocate a (plaintext) page to communicate with the hypervisor (the GHCB).
We observed that randomly an application compiled with hermit would crash or enter a spin-loop sometimes around the introduction of the IDT. This bug was random in that recompilation with some changes at unrelated places in the code could eliminate the bug. This made debugging "fun" (as in: adding a print makes the bug disappear fun).
This clearly screams of "memory corruption" somewhere. But where, actually? I don't really know, but this patch is an attempt at fixing one possible source.
What this does, and why?
This fix is actually two fixes in one.
First,
map_frame_range(inphysicalmem.rs) will, when an offset is used, map all pages also at a fixed offset. This will obviously require spawning new page tables, and it turns out that the physical free list may at this point contain0x0as a valid frame, which may get picked up. I don't know if it's bad-bad, but since the page table is identity mapped, this means that accessing the page table entry requires dereferencing virtual address 0, aka the null pointer, which certainly cannot be good.Second, it turns out that the SMP boot code has a fixed address of
0x8000. This address is only the 8th frame in the free list, so you can be sure it is going to be used, either by the offset mapping, or later on when mapping the heap. However, when the SMP boot code is loaded, it will overwrite that page table entry, and corrupt the page table. I guess this bug can happen if you use a heap intensive application, it will reach a point where it accesses a part of the heap which is corrupt and crash. Maybe. I'm not certain.To avoid these two problems, we propose a quickfix: just ignore the first 2 MB of physical addresses.
What else?
The
detect_from_fdtmethod looks a bit "dangerous" to me, in that it detects memory and immediately uses it to map it (sometimes). In most cases, no mapping is created, because UEFI already identity mapped everything, but in the cases where it does use it immediately, it may use pages that should be reserved and would have left the free list later in the procedure. The fact that pages are mapped immediately may cause issues. But not sure.