Open
Conversation
Author
|
The same optimization I made here: swiftlang/swift#77369 |
Author
|
@hmlongco Michael, please, can you take a look on this PR? It should significantly improve |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is no need to use heavy
String(reflecting:), there is much faster alternative.But internally,
String(reflecting:)called on class-type eventually calls_typeName(:qualified:)function withqualified: true.Full call-stack:
String(reflecting:)_debugPrint_unlocked. Because Any.Type does not conform any of checked protocols._adHocPrint_unlocked_adHocPrint_unlocked.printTypeName@hmlongco Michael, I'd love your suggestions on how to edit comments for
globalIdentifierfunction.