Skip to content

Implement postcard_schema::Schema for VecDeque, Rc, and Arc#277

Open
Calsign wants to merge 3 commits intojamesmunns:mainfrom
AutoPallet:postcard-dyn-impl-vec-deque-arc-rc
Open

Implement postcard_schema::Schema for VecDeque, Rc, and Arc#277
Calsign wants to merge 3 commits intojamesmunns:mainfrom
AutoPallet:postcard-dyn-impl-vec-deque-arc-rc

Conversation

@Calsign
Copy link
Contributor

@Calsign Calsign commented Oct 31, 2025

These are standard library types so I assume they are uncontroversial. I followed the existing conventions for these types.

(Side question: I understand the postcard-schema/postcard-schema-dyn split, but why do we need to implement the same schemas for both alloc and std, why can't std reuse the alloc implementations?)

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Deploy Preview for cute-starship-2d9c9b canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ff2c656
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/cute-starship-2d9c9b/deploys/690549af8a2a350008359a0d

It's not present on all systems, as evidenced by the CI check for RISC-V.
it's possible it can be added back with the right cfg flags.
@Calsign Calsign force-pushed the postcard-dyn-impl-vec-deque-arc-rc branch from ff2c656 to f8a0451 Compare January 2, 2026 16:20
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 2, 2026

Deploy Preview for cute-starship-2d9c9b canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f8a0451
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/cute-starship-2d9c9b/deploys/6957f054bc24630008e12c20

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant