feat: consume frame after added, for reducing memory usage#32
Open
meowtec wants to merge 2 commits intojaredforth:mainfrom
Open
feat: consume frame after added, for reducing memory usage#32meowtec wants to merge 2 commits intojaredforth:mainfrom
meowtec wants to merge 2 commits intojaredforth:mainfrom
Conversation
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
meowtec
force-pushed
the
feat/memory-reduce
branch
from
10a3a12 to
8ad7c9d
Compare
jaredforth
requested changes
Aug 26, 2025
Owner
jaredforth
left a comment
jaredforth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for submitting!
There are a couple merge conflicts that need to be addressed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If we encode a WebP animation with many frames, caching all frames into a Vec and then adding them all to the encoder at once is not a good approach. This could potentially lead to excessive memory usage.
It is better to consume each frames after they are added.
API BREAKING CHANGE
AnimEncoder::add_frame()should return a Result.(
AnimEncoder::encodemaybe should rename toAnimEncoder::finish, I'm not sure.)In addition I update the example code to create a more complex and beautiful animation.
BTW, the animation decoder should return a iterator instead of a vector for the same reason.