Skip to content

Sync Kaizen dogfood contracts#28

Merged
s-hiraoku merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/daily-dogfood-sync
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

Sync Kaizen dogfood contracts#28
s-hiraoku merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/daily-dogfood-sync

Conversation

@s-hiraoku

@s-hiraoku s-hiraoku commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Sync deterministic Kaizen dogfood contracts from kaizen-agents-org/.github.
  • Update only the manifest-managed shared skills, issue template, Kaizen config, and agent guidance.

Verification

  • Automated sync copied and compared every manifest-managed path.

Generated by the daily dogfood sync workflow.
Source issue: not supplied by this automated sync run.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified how PR feedback should be reviewed and tracked, including thread-based replies and resolving addressed comments when possible.
    • Expanded final reporting to include review-thread counts, resolved items, and any remaining blockers for clearer status visibility.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@s-hiraoku, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 55 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 38a5e7f0-277e-4ae1-ae07-5c45c61c29d8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b622089 and 3d250c1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • skills/pr-guardian/SKILL.md
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The SKILL.md documentation for the pr-guardian skill was updated to require thread-aware inspection of review feedback, per-thread replies and resolution of addressed threads with a fallback PR comment when direct replies aren't possible, and expanded Final Report requirements including reply counts and unresolved thread counts.

Changes

PR Guardian documentation update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Thread-aware feedback handling and reporting
skills/pr-guardian/SKILL.md
Required Behavior now mandates inspecting thread-aware inline review data, replying per-thread, resolving addressed threads, and falling back to a linked PR comment when direct replies aren't possible; Final Report now requires per-thread reply counts, resolved thread counts, and unresolved review-thread counts alongside existing report items.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title matches the main goal of syncing Kaizen dogfood contracts and is concise and specific enough.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/daily-dogfood-sync

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c6e008d7a4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread skills/pr-guardian/SKILL.md

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@skills/pr-guardian/SKILL.md`:
- Around line 58-65: Update the final report section in SKILL.md so it
explicitly counts unresolved outdated review threads as part of the remaining
thread/blocker total, not just the “current” review-thread count. Adjust the
wording around the final report fields to include this in the unresolved current
review-thread count or remaining blockers, and keep the rest of the report items
in place.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 9dbf9f81-721e-4c19-b143-39221beecd15

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a5cc312 and b622089.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • skills/pr-guardian/SKILL.md

Comment thread skills/pr-guardian/SKILL.md Outdated
@s-hiraoku s-hiraoku merged commit c7f273a into main Jul 3, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants