Multivariate analysis, designed experiments, and process monitoring for Python. Built for the chemometrics, manufacturing, and pharma workflows where you need to know not just what fits, but is this observation normal, which variable moved, and how sure am I?
New here? The architecture overview (source) is the map of the codebase - package layout, the estimator stack, and the MCP tool layer.
The last few releases extend process-improve from offline model-building into
end-to-end, on-line workflows. Highlights (full history in CHANGELOG.md):
- Models that keep up with a drifting process.
AdaptivePCAandAdaptivePLS(v1.55) are recursive estimators for on-line monitoring and soft sensing: start from an initial fit, then stream one observation at a time. They track the operating point, re-learn the correlation structure, and tell you - in units of components - exactly how far the process has drifted from where it was trained. - A DOE engine that goes past textbook designs. OMARS (orthogonal minimally
aliased response surfaces), D-/I-/A-optimal designs, fractional-cube CCDs,
design augmentation (
fixed_runs=), and anevaluate_designsuite that scores any design on D/I/G-efficiency, aliasing, and prediction variance. - Sensory & descriptive panel analysis (
process_improve.sensory): validate a panel, flag inconsistent assessors with the Mixed Assessor Model, and relate attributes to product covariates - with an honest genuine-vs-proxy separation. - Robust regression (
process_improve.regression): repeated-median and Theil-Sen estimators for data with outliers, plusOLSandfit_robust_lm.
process-improve provides production-grade implementations of the methods
practitioners actually use on real plant and lab data:
- PCA with SVD and NIPALS, plus native missing-value handling via Trimmed Score Regression
- PLS regression with a fully sklearn-compatible API, VIP scores, and cross-validated diagnostics
- TPLS - PLS for T-shaped (multi-block) data structures
- Adaptive PCA / PLS - recursive, self-updating models for on-line process monitoring and soft sensing; they follow a drifting process one observation at a time and report how far it has moved
- Outlier detection combining Hotelling's T² and SPE with an ESD-based test
- Designed experiments - full-factorial, fractional-factorial, and
response-surface designs; OMARS and D-/I-/A-optimal designs; a design-quality
scorer (
evaluate_design); and a multi-stage DOE strategy recommender - Process monitoring - Shewhart, CUSUM, and Holt-Winters control charts
- Batch data analysis - alignment, feature extraction, and multivariate batch monitoring (MBPCA / MBPLS)
- Sensory & descriptive panel analysis - panel validation, the Mixed Assessor Model, and attribute-to-product relations with a genuine-vs-proxy separation
- Robust regression - repeated-median and Theil-Sen estimators for data with outliers
- Interactive Plotly diagnostics bound directly to every fitted model
Outputs are pandas-native: scores, loadings, and predictions keep your row
and column labels.
It is the companion package to the online textbook Process Improvement using Data.
process-improve is designed to sit next to scikit-learn, not replace it. It
follows the same conventions (fit, predict, score, the _ suffix on fitted
attributes), so its estimators drop straight into Pipeline, GridSearchCV, and
cross_val_score. What it adds is the process-analytics layer on top: the
diagnostics that tell you whether a new observation is normal, which variable moved, and
how confident the prediction is.
| Capability | scikit-learn | process-improve |
|---|---|---|
| PCA, PLS with sklearn-style API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Missing-data fitting (NIPALS / TSR) | - | ✓ |
| Hotelling's T² + SPE outlier limits | - | ✓ |
| Variable-level score contributions | - | ✓ |
| Cross-validated coefficient confidence intervals | - | ✓ |
| Multi-block models (TPLS) | - | ✓ |
| On-line / adaptive monitoring (recursive PCA/PLS) | - | ✓ |
| Designed experiments, incl. OMARS & optimal | - | ✓ |
| Control charts (Shewhart / CUSUM / Holt-Winters) | - | ✓ |
| Batch process monitoring (MBPCA / MBPLS) | - | ✓ |
| Plotly diagnostics built in | - | ✓ |
Labeled DataFrame outputs |
partial | ✓ |
pip install process-improve # core (numpy, pandas, sklearn, statsmodels, patsy, pydantic, pyyaml, tqdm)
pip install 'process-improve[plotting]' # adds matplotlib, plotly, seaborn, ridgeplot
pip install 'process-improve[expt]' # adds pyDOE3 (designed experiments / DOE)
pip install 'process-improve[batch]' # adds openpyxl, scikit-image (batch process data IO)
pip install 'process-improve[mcp]' # adds the MCP server runtime
pip install 'process-improve[fast]' # adds numba (JIT speedups for batch alignment)
pip install 'process-improve[all]' # everything above (the pre-1.24.11 closure)Requires Python 3.10 or newer. The core install pulls in numpy, pandas,
scikit-learn, statsmodels, patsy, pydantic, pyyaml, and
tqdm (scipy arrives transitively via scikit-learn and statsmodels).
Heavier optional surfaces (plotting, designed experiments, batch IO,
MCP server, numba JIT) live in extras so a caller who only needs, say,
detect_multivariate_outliers does not have to install Plotly or numba.
import pandas as pd
from process_improve.multivariate.methods import PCA, MCUVScaler
X = pd.read_csv("your_data.csv", index_col=0)
X_scaled = MCUVScaler().fit_transform(X)
pca = PCA(n_components=3).fit(X_scaled)
print(pca.r2_cumulative_) # cumulative R² per component
pca.score_plot() # interactive Plotly figure
# Flag outliers using combined T² and SPE limits at 95% confidence
outliers = pca.detect_outliers(conf_level=0.95)
# Which variables drove the first observation off?
contrib = pca.score_contributions(pca.scores_.iloc[0].values)from process_improve.multivariate.methods import PLS, MCUVScaler
# Scale X and Y separately
scaler_x = MCUVScaler().fit(X)
scaler_y = MCUVScaler().fit(Y)
X_s, Y_s = scaler_x.transform(X), scaler_y.transform(Y)
pls = PLS(n_components=3).fit(X_s, Y_s)
print(pls.beta_coefficients_) # regression coefficients (K x M)
print(pls.r2_cumulative_) # cumulative R² for Y
print(pls.vip()) # VIP scores per X variable
# Predict new observations (sklearn-compatible: returns just y_hat)
y_pred = pls.predict(scaler_x.transform(X_new))
# Predict with full per-row diagnostics (scores, T², SPE, plus y_hat)
result = pls.diagnose(scaler_x.transform(X_new))
result.y_hat # point predictions
result.spe # squared prediction error
result.hotellings_t2 # Hotelling's T² for new observations
# Cross-validated component selection
cv_select = PLS.select_n_components(X_s, Y_s, max_components=6)
print(cv_select.n_components) # recommended number of components
print(cv_select.rmsecv) # RMSECV per component count
# Cross-validation with beta-coefficient confidence intervals
cv = pls.cross_validate(X_s, Y_s, cv="loo")
print(cv.beta_ci_lower, cv.beta_ci_upper) # 95% CI for each beta
print(cv.significant) # betas significantly != 0
print(cv.q_squared) # cross-validated R² (Q²)from process_improve.experiments.factor import Factor, Response
from process_improve.experiments.strategy import recommend_strategy
factors = [
Factor(name="Temperature", low=25, high=40, units="degC"),
Factor(name="pH", low=5.0, high=7.5),
Factor(name="Glucose", low=10, high=50, units="g/L"),
]
strategy = recommend_strategy(
factors=factors,
responses=[Response(name="Yield", goal="maximize", units="g/L")],
budget=40,
domain="fermentation",
)
for s in strategy["stages"]:
print(s["stage_number"], s["design_type"], s["estimated_runs"])Ask for a ready-to-run design table and score it, in two lines:
from process_improve.experiments import Factor, generate_design, evaluate_design
factors = [
Factor(name="A", low=-1, high=1),
Factor(name="B", low=-1, high=1),
Factor(name="C", low=-1, high=1),
]
# An OMARS design: main effects clear of every second-order term
design = generate_design(factors, design_type="omars")
# Or a run-budgeted D-optimal design, then grade its quality
d_opt = generate_design(factors, design_type="d_optimal", budget=14)
print(evaluate_design(d_opt, metric="all")) # D/I/G-efficiency, aliasing, prediction varianceA static model goes stale the moment the process drifts. AdaptivePCA starts
from an initial fit, then keeps learning as data streams in - flagging faults and
reporting exactly how far the process has moved from where it was trained:
from process_improve.multivariate import AdaptivePCA
# Seed on a block of known-good ("common cause") data
monitor = AdaptivePCA(n_components=3).fit(X_reference)
# Feed live observations one row at a time
for _, row in X_stream.iterrows():
result = monitor.update(row.to_numpy())
if not result.in_control:
print(f"Out-of-control point: SPE={result.spe:.2f}, T²={result.hotellings_t2:.2f}")
# How far has the model drifted from its training subspace? (in units of components)
print(monitor.distance_.tail())
print(monitor.center_shift_.tail()) # operating-point migration, in training-SD unitsAdaptivePLS does the same for regression and soft sensing, and handles
infrequently-sampled responses: the X-space model adapts every step while the
regression part waits for the next lab result.
Longer, fully-worked versions of each example live in the
Quickstart guide
and the examples/ folder.
New to designed experiments? The Applied DoE tutorial is an eight-module worked-solution series.
PCA and PLS follow scikit-learn conventions: fit() returns self, fitted
attributes end with a trailing underscore (scores_, loadings_, spe_,
hotellings_t2_, r2_cumulative_, ...), and predict() returns an
sklearn.utils.Bunch with named fields (y_hat, spe, hotellings_t2, ...).
Inputs are accepted as pandas.DataFrame, and index/column labels are
preserved through fit and transform.
- API reference & user guide: https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/
- Applied DoE tutorial (8 modules): https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/applied_doe/index.html
- Companion textbook: Process Improvement using Data
- Local docs build:
cd docs && make html
If you use this package in academic work, please cite it. The
CITATION.cff file carries the current version and
release date, and GitHub renders a "Cite this repository" button in
the sidebar with ready-made BibTeX and APA entries:
@software{dunn_process_improve,
author = {Dunn, Kevin G.},
title = {{process-improve: Multivariate Analysis for Process Improvement}},
year = {2026},
url = {https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve}
}Add the version field from CITATION.cff (or the release tag you
installed) when citing a specific version.
Bug reports, feature requests, and pull requests are welcome. See CONTRIBUTING.md for development setup, testing, and code style. Bugs and feature requests can be filed on the issue tracker.
MIT - see LICENSE for details.