improving image sizes#39
Conversation
|
These images are processed through Imagine and thumnailed. So the source image is not what we show the user. So I'm genuinely not sure if this affects the final image sizes or not. @Leannapelham were you generally being proactive or did you see a problem with the image sizes on the site? |
|
Hm, yeah, not sure if updated source image size will affect the final image size after Imagine. Btw, Lighthouse (IIRC) suggests using the new Webp format for images as that one has even better size with the same quality. And I see Imagine in theory should support it as well: https://github.com/liip/LiipImagineBundle/blob/2.x/Resources/doc/basic-usage.rst#webp-image-format I wonder if we should move to that format instead? |
|
Hmm, what about 2 things:
|
|
That would simplify things with blog... I think we kinda overcomplicated it now. I wonder if we should add hash to the image filenames to allow us to cache them forever? Also wonder if that Polish (🇵🇱?) thing would require to be paid extra. |

ran all the blog images through an optimizer to improve image size