⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Optimize SequenceMatcher in vendor lookup#58
⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Optimize SequenceMatcher in vendor lookup#58kourdroid wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: kourdroid <36898160+kourdroid@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
💡 What: Pre-initialize difflib.SequenceMatcher and assign the static
sanitized_currentstring to parameterbto cache heuristics outside the loop. Usequick_ratio()to quickly skip expensiveratio()computations for unlikely matches.🎯 Why:
difflib.SequenceMatcher(None, a, b)caches heuristics about thebsequence. Recreating the object or changingbdiscards this cache. By putting the static string inband updatingaviaset_seq1(), we save processing time.quick_ratio()offers an upper bound in O(1) time.📊 Impact: Measured microbenchmark shows a ~3.5x speedup (~0.22s down to ~0.06s for 1000 iterations). Reduces CPU overhead in fingerprint lookups for large document registries.
🔬 Measurement: Added a standalone performance test demonstrating the improvement. The project test suite passes locally.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 14926747987523090832 started by @kourdroid