Skip to content

Will/fix/ros2 graph msf cmake#36

Open
nubertj wants to merge 101 commits into
mainfrom
will/fix/ros2_graph_msf_cmake
Open

Will/fix/ros2 graph msf cmake#36
nubertj wants to merge 101 commits into
mainfrom
will/fix/ros2_graph_msf_cmake

Conversation

@nubertj

@nubertj nubertj commented Apr 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Old MR from Will, but now against main: #22 (comment)

deepanaishtaweera and others added 30 commits May 19, 2025 10:26
…nventions, including updated includes, parameter handling, and subscription methods. Transition from ros::NodeHandle to rclcpp::Node and adjust message types accordingly for improved compatibility with ROS 2 architecture.
…icTransforms and simplify initialization with only the node pointer.
…raph and smb_estimator_graph_replay, enhancing maintainability and aligning with ROS 2 conventions.
…eading and writing bags, improving performance and compatibility with ROS 2 conventions.
…_in_folder.py, adding support for covariance data and improving error handling.
…y points for console scripts. Introduce new resource file for graph_msf_ros2.
…ings for Cholesky factorization and marginals computation, while commenting out the center reference frames parameter.
@nubertj nubertj requested review from tutunarsl and willat343 April 5, 2026 19:58
@nubertj

nubertj commented May 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@willat343 somehow your change to make the cmake work for ros2 seemed to get lost in the history. Can you cherrypick that commit and make a fresh MR against main?
Might not be worth it to manually resolve this one...

@willat343

willat343 commented May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nubertj it appears the changes (detailed here) are already in main. I was able to build in ros2 docker with custom locations without a problem

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants