Open
Conversation
li-roy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2018
pytorch#14040) Summary: …2164)" This reverts commit 4b7c615. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#14040 Differential Revision: D13089531 Pulled By: yinghai fbshipit-source-id: 2114b36111dab6f179c02921bbc9bd382ef461bf
li-roy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2019
Summary: Currently there is a mismatch in naming between Python BatchNorm `running_var` and C++ BatchNorm `running_variance`, which causes JIT model parameters loading to fail (pytorch/vision#728 (comment)): ``` terminate called after throwing an instance of 'c10::Error' what(): No such serialized tensor 'running_variance' (read at /home/shahriar/Build/pytorch/torch/csrc/api/src/serialize/input-archive.cpp:27) frame #0: c10::Error::Error(c10::SourceLocation, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 0x85 (0x7f2d92d32f95 in /usr/local/lib/libc10.so) frame #1: torch::serialize::InputArchive::read(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, at::Tensor&, bool) + 0xdeb (0x7f2d938551ab in /usr/local/lib/libtorch.so.1) frame pytorch#2: torch::nn::Module::load(torch::serialize::InputArchive&) + 0x98 (0x7f2d9381cd08 in /usr/local/lib/libtorch.so.1) frame pytorch#3: torch::nn::Module::load(torch::serialize::InputArchive&) + 0xf9 (0x7f2d9381cd69 in /usr/local/lib/libtorch.so.1) frame pytorch#4: torch::nn::Module::load(torch::serialize::InputArchive&) + 0xf9 (0x7f2d9381cd69 in /usr/local/lib/libtorch.so.1) frame pytorch#5: torch::nn::operator>>(torch::serialize::InputArchive&, std::shared_ptr<torch::nn::Module> const&) + 0x32 (0x7f2d9381c7b2 in /usr/local/lib/libtorch.so.1) frame pytorch#6: <unknown function> + 0x2b16c (0x5645f4d1916c in /home/shahriar/Projects/CXX/build-TorchVisionTest-Desktop_Qt_5_12_1_GCC_64bit-Debug/TorchVisionTest) frame pytorch#7: <unknown function> + 0x27a3c (0x5645f4d15a3c in /home/shahriar/Projects/CXX/build-TorchVisionTest-Desktop_Qt_5_12_1_GCC_64bit-Debug/TorchVisionTest) frame pytorch#8: <unknown function> + 0x2165c (0x5645f4d0f65c in /home/shahriar/Projects/CXX/build-TorchVisionTest-Desktop_Qt_5_12_1_GCC_64bit-Debug/TorchVisionTest) frame pytorch#9: <unknown function> + 0x1540b (0x5645f4d0340b in /home/shahriar/Projects/CXX/build-TorchVisionTest-Desktop_Qt_5_12_1_GCC_64bit-Debug/TorchVisionTest) frame pytorch#10: __libc_start_main + 0xf3 (0x7f2d051dd223 in /usr/lib/libc.so.6) frame pytorch#11: <unknown function> + 0x1381e (0x5645f4d0181e in /home/shahriar/Projects/CXX/build-TorchVisionTest-Desktop_Qt_5_12_1_GCC_64bit-Debug/TorchVisionTest) ``` Renaming C++ BatchNorm `running_variance` to `running_var` should fix this problem. This is a BC-breaking change, but it should be easy for end user to rename `running_variance` to `running_var` in their call sites. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#17371 Reviewed By: goldsborough Differential Revision: D14172775 Pulled By: yf225 fbshipit-source-id: b9d3729ec79272a8084269756f28a8f7c4dd16b6
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.