-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
fix(email): use SELECT FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED to prevent duplicate email dispatch on concurrent Celery Beat runs #9609
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
harsh4vardhan
wants to merge
1
commit into
makeplane:preview
Choose a base branch
from
harsh4vardhan:fix/9602-email-notification-select-for-update
base: preview
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+18
−8
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift
Use a recoverable claim state instead of terminal processing.
Line 65 commits
processed_atbefore anysend_email_notification.delay()call. If the worker exits or the broker rejects a publish, the row remainsprocessed_atwithsent_at=NULL. Future runs exclude the notification, so the email is permanently lost.Persist a recoverable claim or transactional outbox record in this transaction. Dispatch from that durable record. Mark the notification processed only after the dispatch workflow has a recovery path.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The outbox/recoverable-claim pattern is a valid long-term improvement but is out of scope for this PR. This PR trades permanent-loss risk for duplicate-email risk: by marking
processed_atinside the transaction (before dispatch), a second concurrent worker skips already-claimed rows and no row is dispatched twice. If a worker exits after the transaction but beforesend_email_notification.delay()publishes, the email is permanently lost for that notification. That is the accepted tradeoff here. A full outbox implementation (persist claim → dispatch → mark sent) would be a separate PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@harsh4vardhan, understood. The current change intentionally prioritizes preventing duplicate emails over recovery from a failure between the claim transaction and task publication.The finding does not require a change in this PR. Would you like me to create a follow-up GitHub issue for the transactional outbox or recoverable-claim design?
✏️ Learnings added
You are interacting with an AI system.