refine: author §F1 visa-security blindspots (B-F1-1..5)#136
Open
mokashang wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Fills the 5 §F1 placeholder entries with citation-grounded, cn-SDE-specific blindspots (cap-gap work-authorization gap, OPT unemployment-day accounting, 60-day grace mechanics, sponsor-quality selection, day-1 CPT risk). Drafted interactively and reviewed by the user in-session. Citations reference source-views in sources.yaml. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Fills the 5 §F1 (visa-security maximization) placeholder entries in
domain_knowledge/cn-sde-jobhunt/blindspots.mdwith authored content.Entries
Provenance / review mode
Drafted interactively with the user in a live session; each entry was
reviewed and approved in-chat before this commit. This PR is left
OPEN for the user to review and merge — it deliberately does NOT use
the routine's auto-review / auto-merge path. No governance files, logs,
or memory were touched.
Quality bar (§5)
Each entry is grounded (
[doc: ...]citations to source-views insources.yaml), cn-SDE-specific, non-obvious, and few-and-deep. Legalmechanics (grace-period math, OPT day accounting, cap-gap) are stated
at a defensible level — the author (lived experience) should verify
exact figures before merge.
🤖 Drafted with Claude (interactive, human-reviewed)