Conversation
Added instructions for installing nidaqmx with gRPC support.
zhindes
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2026
bkeryan
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added instructions for installing nidaqmx with gRPC support.
- [ ] I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.- [ ] I've added tests applicable for this pull requestWhat does this Pull Request accomplish?
Adds documentation to the Installation section of the README explaining how to install nidaqmx with gRPC support using pip install nidaqmx[grpc]. This information was previously undocumented, causing confusion for users who encountered missing dependency errors (e.g., session_pb2) when trying to use nidaqmx over gRPC.
Related bug: #916
Why should this Pull Request be merged?
The [grpc] install extra is the intended way to pull in the required gRPC dependencies, but this was not documented anywhere in the README.
What testing has been done?
This is a documentation change to README.rst. The RST syntax has been visually verified to be consistent with the existing formatting in the file.
