-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
fix: Align TracingHook with spec #342
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @danjuv, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the TracingHook to better align with the OpenFeature specification by moving logic to finally_after and enhancing the error hook. The changes are well-implemented and improve spec compliance.
One minor point of clarification: the pull request description mentions that exclude_exceptions defaults to true, but the implementation correctly defaults it to false to maintain backward compatibility. This is the right approach, but the description could be updated to avoid confusion.
I've added one suggestion to further improve alignment with the specification for error event attributes.
| attributes = { | ||
| EventAttributes.KEY: hook_context.flag_key, | ||
| EventAttributes.RESULT_VALUE: json.dumps(hook_context.default_value), | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To better align with the OpenFeature specification, feature_flag.provider_name should be included in the attributes for an error event when available. This change will also require updating test_error to include provider_metadata in the HookContext and assert this new attribute.
| attributes = { | |
| EventAttributes.KEY: hook_context.flag_key, | |
| EventAttributes.RESULT_VALUE: json.dumps(hook_context.default_value), | |
| } | |
| attributes = { | |
| EventAttributes.KEY: hook_context.flag_key, | |
| EventAttributes.RESULT_VALUE: json.dumps(hook_context.default_value), | |
| } | |
| if hook_context.provider_metadata: | |
| attributes[EventAttributes.PROVIDER_NAME] = ( | |
| hook_context.provider_metadata.name | |
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@danjuv I believe this is correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@toddbaert @federicobond updated
…ated on failure Signed-off-by: Danju Visvanathan <danju.visvanathan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Danju Visvanathan <danju.visvanathan@gmail.com>
0670bda to
8706459
Compare
Signed-off-by: Danju Visvanathan <danju.visvanathan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Danju Visvanathan <danju.visvanathan@gmail.com>
Changes
This PR:
finally_afterso it's run if the hook errorsexclude_exceptionto conditionally generate an exception on error (defaults to false to avoid breaking changes)Done to align with the spec.
fixes #340