Add pool_dep_fulfilled_in_map function

[kontura]

This can be used to determine dependency closure on a given set of packages (even with complex dependencies).

It is basically solver_dep_fulfilled(...) but without Solver.

I have created this when looking for a solution to rpm-software-management/dnf-plugins-core#549

[mlschroe]

Hi, just as a heads up: I'm fine with adding this but I don't like the name of the function.

[kontura]

Hi, just as a heads up: I'm fine with adding this but I don't like the name of the function.

Would just pool_dep_fulfilled be better?

[mlschroe]

The _map prefix is fine (though I would drop the _in, because we don't have it in the other functions that have a installedmap argument). I'll merge the pull request now, I'll do the rename later.

[mlschroe]

I think it's either pool_dep_satisfied_map or pool_dep_fulfilled_map. Any preferences?

[kontura]

I think it's either pool_dep_satisfied_map or pool_dep_fulfilled_map. Any preferences?

Personally I would prefer fulfilled but only because it is already used in the solver version.

Either way, thank you.

[mlschroe]

Yes, but that's an internal function and not public API so we can rename it any time we like.

[mlschroe]

Looking at other dependency management systems I seems like satisfied seems to be a bit more common. So I tend to go with pool_dep_satisfied_map (or pool_satisfieddep_map because we already have pool_whatmatchesdep and pool_whatcontainsdep).

[kontura]

I see, pool_satisfieddep_map sounds good to me.