Code Review Fix For Control Statements.#311
Open
SJBaroi wants to merge 1 commit intoopenlookeng:masterfrom
Open
Code Review Fix For Control Statements.#311SJBaroi wants to merge 1 commit intoopenlookeng:masterfrom
SJBaroi wants to merge 1 commit intoopenlookeng:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: SJBaroi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Contributor
|
lgtm |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
Code Review Fix For Control Statements.
/kind task
What does this PR do / why do we need it:
Code Review Fix For Control Statements - use of for each loop instead of traditional for loop if index are not required.
Rule 8.3.1.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #312
Special notes for your reviewers: