README: populate it#54
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe README was expanded from a minimal placeholder to comprehensive project documentation, covering purpose, architecture, installation, containerized development workflow, usage examples, features, directory structure, dependencies, testing commands, contributing guidelines, and project metadata. ChangesREADME Documentation
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 73-78: The README contains fenced code blocks (the CLI commands
block starting with "./projects/skeleton/orchestration/cli.py --help" and the
directory tree block starting with "forge/") that lack language tags and trigger
markdownlint MD040; update those fenced blocks to include appropriate language
identifiers (e.g., use ```bash or ```text as shown in the proposed patch) so the
linter no longer flags them, and apply the same change to the later fenced block
around lines 97–111 to ensure all code fences include a language tag.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
Summary by CodeRabbit